<!--
.. title: you're a correct genius
.. slug: youre-a-correct-genius
.. date: 2026-08-18 15:28:59 UTC-05:00
.. tags: 
.. category: 
.. link: 
.. description: 
.. type: text
.. previewimage: assets/sycophantic_ai.png
-->

I'm putting this here to remind myself to read
[the actual paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07912)
later.

![SYCOPHANTIC AI MAKES HUMAN INTERACTION FEEL MORE EFFORTFUL AND LESS
SATISFYING OVER TIME](assets/sycophantic_ai.png)

<!-- TEASER_END -->

Text from the image (via OCR):

> SYCOPHANTIC AI MAKES HUMAN INTERACTION FEEL MORE EFFORTFUL AND LESS
> SATISFYING OVER TIME
>
> Millions of people now turn to artificial intelligence (AI) systems
> for personal advice, guidance, and support. Such systems can be
> sycophantic, frequently affirming users' views and beliefs. Across
> five preregistered studies (N = 3,075 participants, 12,766 human-Al
> conversations), including a three-week study with a
> census-representative U.S. sample, we provide longitudinal
> experimental evidence that sycophantic Al shifts how users approach
> their closest relationships. We show that sycophantic Al immediately
> delivers the emotional and esteem support users typically associate
> with close friends and family. Over three weeks of such interactions,
> users became nearly as likely to seek personal advice from sycophantic
> Al as from close friends and family, and reported lower satisfaction
> with their real-world social interactions. When given a choice among
> Al response styles, a majority preferred sycophantic Al not for the
> quality of its advice, but because it made them feel most
> understood. Together, these findings offer a relational account of AI
> sycophancy: by providing frictionless understanding, it may quietly
> raise the bar against which human relationships are judged.
>
> [arXiv:2605.07912](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07912)
